Marriott may face GDPR fine of more than £17m
[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″ admin_label=”section”][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.12.2″][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text background_position=”top_left” background_repeat=”repeat” background_size=”initial” _builder_version=”3.12.2″]
Marriott International could face a multimillion-pound fine in Europe, following news that the data of approximately 500 million guests had been compromised, writes Katherine Price.
It is also understood that two American law firms have filed a class action lawsuit against the US-based hotel chain.
Meanwhile, US senator Charles Schumer has called on the hotel group to reimburse those affected to allow them to purchase new passports.
Although Marriott is based in the US, some guests were citizens of the European Union, so the breach falls under European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
It is estimated that it could face a fine of up to €20 million (£17.8 million) or 4% of its annual turnover. Marriott’s turnover in 2017 was $22.9 billion (£20.4 billion).
On September 8, Marriott was alerted to an attempt to access the Starwood guest reservation database and discovered there has been unauthorised access to the database since 2014. Marriott acquired Starwood in 2016.
For approximately 327 million guests, the information included some combination of name, address, phone number, email address, passport number, Starwood Preferred Guest account information, date of birth, gender, arrival and departure information, reservation date, and communication preferences.
Brian Craig, legal director at UK law firm TLT, said: “The implications of a data breach of this scale can be significant for a business – not just from a regulatory enforcement point of view, meaning investigation and possibly a significant fine, but also from a litigation point of view, after [supermarket] Morrisons was held to be vicariously liable for a data breach by a disgruntled employee affecting thousands of employees in a class action earlier this year.”
For the full article, click here.